Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
They include, but are not limited to the following:"Creators, rightholders, intermediaries, users, copyright law and state or quasi state institutions form a complex feedback system in which technological change is a factor. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Among other cases, the Supreme Courtandrsquo;s majority opinion cited the 1987 case Shearson/American Express Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Court’s directive in Boumediene that “[i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches,” 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
Holder. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
DiRuzza v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(IP tango) Europe IP work disrupted by volcano (Managing Intellectual Property) When the dog expires - General Court decision in Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) Questions emerge over undisclosed terms of new EPO president’s contract (IAM) OHIM’s case law review for 2009 now available (Class 46) Gala and Golden Delicious share latest GI (Class 46) Bad Kissinger gets no GI protection as Commission strikes out German mass application (IPKat) European Commission… [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Holder and Abbott v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:04 am
After the jump a few words about: Holder v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:35 pm
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Oral Argument in Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
See General Foods Corporation v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
