Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 7,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
" Stevens leaves a diverse legal legacy, authoring landmark decisions ranging from Reno v ACLU, the 1997 decision that anointed the internet with broad First Amendment protection, to Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council [1984], which has guided the administrative state ever since. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:46 pm
Article: Liberating the Individual from Battles Between States – Justifying Party Autonomy in Conflict of Laws Matthias Lehmann has written an article that, while trying to... [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
As part of the liberal quartet of the Supreme Court he had helped establish habeas corpus for terrorists captured overseas in 2006 and wrote a masterpiece of dissent in the recent Citizens United v F.E.C. - a case concerning corporate free speech in the tune of campaign dollars to candidates. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Texas, the opinion that overruled Bowers v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
If you're a liberal who cares deeply about the separation of church and state, why would you favor religion-based exceptions to laws that otherwise apply uniformly? [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
In the recent landmark United States Supreme Court confrontation clause decisions, Justice Stevens voted with the majority in both Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Douglas for being too liberal, saying he had endorsed “hippie-yippie-style revolution. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
The PBA, however, conceded that none of the relevant collective bargaining agreements between the city and the PBA addressed the issue of health benefits for retirees.A State Supreme Court justice granted the PBA’s petition and directed the city to continue to pay for the more liberal (and expensive) health plan. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Bhagwati and Justice Chinappa Reddy et al. expanded the rights of the poor by liberally interpreting the fundamental rights to bring them in tune with the other guiding principles of the Constitution, namely, the directive principles of state policy. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
Google v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
ACTA Meanwhile it's not as if the United States can escape similar criticism. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Secunda, District Court Amicus Brief of Law Professors in Support of Defendants, Associated Oregon Industries v. [read post]
