Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6621 - 6640
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2010, 9:03 am
The court of appeals used the four part test set out in Seabrook Foods v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
The Federal Register notice, curiously enough, does not expressly state the date on which these rules have taken, or will take, effect. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:52 am
’s HIPCRICKET name and registered mark infringes and dilutes Cricket’s CRICKET registered mark. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:32 pm
” Another reader praised the blog for keeping the state’s legal community up to date on the Eaton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:16 pm
It stems from the case of USA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
The Federal Register notice, curiously enough, does not expressly state the date on which these rules have taken, or will take, effect. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:55 am
F.F.T., LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Bank v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:20 am
The case is titled Air Dimensional, Inc., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:07 am
It should not be construed as legal advice and readers are encouraged to consult a qualified attorney regarding these matters.Henry V. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
These appeals will consider whether the Secretary of State can lawfully make the exercise of a child’s right to be registered as a British citizen conditional on their payment of £1,012. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Election Act to require third party sponsors of election advertising during a campaign period to register with the Chief Electoral Officer. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Stone (PDF), the employer, a registered broker-dealer of insurance products, discharged two registered salespeople. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
IndianaUniv-v-MidAmerica-Complaint-logo [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:09 pm
The amendments become effective 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
6 May 2007, 5:07 pm
On Thursday 10 May there's a hearing in Case C-311/05 P Naipes Heraclio Fournier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, a desperate appeal by the owner of the copyright in some illustrations on Spanish playing cards against the Court of First Instance's refusal to reverse the Board of Appeal's decision that those illustrations were wrongfully registered as Community trade marks for, er, playing cards.On the same day the Court of First Instance gives… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
(The court cited the cases of Watson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:15 pm
See The Upper Deck Company v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
As he pointed out, if the New Jersey District Court had had to construe the 1955 agreement, it would not have applied federal common law principles: US contract law varied from state to state and there was no nationwide federal contract law available to apply. [read post]
