Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 6641 - 6660 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
 What was marketed as a slam dunk of an investment turned out to be little more than a foul.SEC ComplaintOn September 29, 2018,  the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged Erick Laszlo Mathe (former Chief Executive Officer of Vision Broadcast Network and its largest shareholder), 42, North Miami Beach, FL, and Ashif Jiwa, 55, Miami Beach, FL, with violating Sections 5(a) and (c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of… [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by Julio César Córdoba
Alegó esas casuales en relación con: a) asuntos jurisdiccionales; b) la causalidad entre las medidas tomadas por Argentina y la venta de las participaciones de El Paso en las Sociedades Argentinas; c) las medidas tomadas por Argentina, el precio spot y los pagos por capacidad; d) el efecto acumulativo determinado por el Tribunal en las medidas adoptadas por Argentina y e) el análisis de la defensa de necesidad alegado por Argentina en el proceso arbitral. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
(c) Farm trucks, farm stock, farm tools, farm equipment, supplies and seed not to exceed $4,500 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
(c) Farm trucks, farm stock, farm tools, farm equipment, supplies and seed not to exceed $4,500 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:50 am by John Potter
If you go this route, you pay a private company that has a contract with the Medicare program to take care of your Part A and Part B needs. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
§ 104 (a) (1); and The payments are also those as described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c) (2), or 26 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:08 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Ricoh Company, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 13-474-SLR (D.Del., September 12, 2014), the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), based on lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant Ricoh Company, Ltd. [read post]
The plaintiffs were borrowers who filed an action in the state court against the mortgagee, a title insurance company, and appraisers alleging civil conspiracy, violation of the West Virginia Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices Act, violation of the Residential Mortgage Lender, Broker and Services Act, and unconscionable contract. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:58 pm by FHH Law
We encourage other communications companies to contribute to the effort. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Or, c) A layoff longer than a layoff described in (b) where the employer recalls an employee who is represented by a trade union within the time set out in an agreement between the union and the employer. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:53 pm by Jon Gelman
These decisions from the WCAB affirm the medical necessity of this care, with strong words directed to Insurance companies who do not operate in good faith in providing home care to injured workershttp://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/archive/2014/08/07/california-wcab-applies-neri-hernandez-to-home-health-care-services-cases.aspxRelated articlesCriminal Charges Urged Against Sedgwick… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:16 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Specifically, proposed § 60-1.35(a) and (b), respectively, would establish a general defenses provision and an essential job functions defense provision. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
That formula then would apply if (a) it's a reasonable measure of damages, (b) the potential loss is difficult to quantify, and (c) it is not intended as a penalty to coerce contractual performance. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The shipping contract authorized the inspection of the package both by the shipping company … Delane Industry Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:26 am by Paul E. Freehling
  The court wrote: “[B]ased on the evidence, Nightingale’s conduct is more properly defined as a separation from the company which was unconditional and intended to operate as a permanent termination of the employment relationship between Nightingale and Helmuth. [read post]