Search for: "Doe Corporation"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 51,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
While the New York legislation does not enact penalties or establish a quota like its California counterpart, it is a sign of continued governmental interest in using the law to diversify corporate boards. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
” And, as the court has long made clear in its understanding of the First Amendment, when the government chooses to speak, the First Amendment does not direct what it can or cannot say. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
One conclusion to draw from this observation is that the disagreement between the Second and Seventh Circuits does not necessarily itself show that the norm of corporate liability lacks the acceptance and precision that Sosa demands. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:35 pm
Some capital income does not actually end up in people’s pocketbooks because it is paid directly to the government in taxes or because it is used to replace worn down assets. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 10:30 am
A recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Theberge-Lindsay v. 3385022 Canada Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:29 am
However, he acknowledged that he was not concerned with the Bribery Act 2010 which does not come into force until later this year. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
For example, mere retirement does not entitle the retiree to dissolution or a buyout (Lubov v Horing & Welikson, P.C., 72 AD3d 752 (2d Dept 2010) (mandatory redemption provision of BCL 1510 does not apply to terminated shareholder). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
In Snukal, id. at 780, fn. 8, the court stated that “when the corporate officer’s actual authority to execute the agreement has been established or is not in doubt, the circumstance that he or she does not specify the office held does not invalidate the agreement as to the corporation,” citing Greve v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
In Snukal, id. at 780, fn. 8, the court stated that “when the corporate officer’s actual authority to execute the agreement has been established or is not in doubt, the circumstance that he or she does not specify the office held does not invalidate the agreement as to the corporation,” citing Greve v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:19 pm
In re Masimo Corporation, Serial No. 77869629 (April 17, 2012) [not precedential].Masimo's primary argument was that resposable "does not appear in the dictionary. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Access does not allow the submission of nominees from those shareholders who cannot nominate. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
As interest in ESG performance increases, so too does the demand for information about firms’ ESG behavior. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:47 pm
McCaffery, the Australian Patent Office has refused to extend the term of the patent on two grounds: thalidomide in combination with a steroid does not constitute goods included on the ARTG, where there is an indication for the combination in an entry for thalidomide; and a combination of separate known dosage forms does not constitute a ‘mixture’ within the meaning of the term ‘pharmaceutical substance per se’. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Many law firms have been issuing alerts of late discussing the enactment of The Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
It also lays out how the Arbitration Fairness Act does nothing to eliminate consumers' choice to go to arbitration, but does everything to eliminate corporations' unfair use of pre-dispute binding mandatory arbitration clauses to force arbitration down people's throats. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
As interest in ESG performance increases, so too does the demand for information about firms’ ESG behavior. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 9:35 am
What does the passage of the DTSA mean for your company? [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:38 am
However, carriers willing to remove the exclusion from the policy typically will require the policy’s definition of “loss” covered under the policy to specify that “loss” does not include environmental remediation costs. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
In the context of searches of corporate property, therefore, it is `clear that a corporation's shareholder -- even a sole shareholder -- does not have standing to assert the corporation's Fourth Amendment rights absent harm to an individualized, legitimate and reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
Most likely, all of these factors would be at play if a trucking company does just what Franklin recommends. [read post]
