Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6641 - 6660 of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
When does Legal Pluralism enhance, when does it erode Legitimacy of and Trust in Democratic Institutions? [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:00 am
As for the claims that Canada does not have laws to address the issue, it bears repeating that Canada does have laws that make recording a movie an infringement and where the recording is for the purposes of distribution there is the prospect of severe fines and jail time. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:07 pm by News Desk
” “But this bill does none of those things, “ Tester added. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:09 am by Eric Schweibenz
On February 23, 2011, the Commission issued a notice determining to review the ID in part. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 7:54 am by emagraken
  They are clearly benefits or compensation similar to benefits, but that alone does not suffice to cause them to fall within s. [read post]
The Warnings Drizos’s supervisor issued a verbal warning after he missed several important meetings and advised him to: (1) improve his attendance; and (2) maintain a regular, in-person presence at work. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
This does not mean the judge will give her a lengthier sentence, but it does mean that he will be required to better explain his rationale in ordering three years in prison for a fatal drunk driving car crash. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:40 pm
” That statement may be measurable, but does not include time frames; it does not lay out a specific game plan for how you will accomplish this goal. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:37 am
What message does this send to both Presidential candidates? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:23 am
This appears to be based on the following three basic reasons: 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by Tom Goldstein
Docket: 08-1119 and 08-1225 Argument date: December 1, 2009 Question presented: Does federal bankruptcy law forbid lawyers from advising their clients to take on more debt when filing for bankruptcy and, if so, is that an unconstitutional violation of their right to free speech? [read post]