Search for: "EMPLOYERS GROUP"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 44,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
The employers were given 15 business days from receipt of the citation to appeal. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Or similarly, suppose a public employer penalizes a group of (non-unionized) teachers who protest merit pay in the school cafeteria. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
McRoberts, counsel in the Uniondale office of Farrell Fritz and a member of the firm’s Business Divorce Group, prepared this article. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group (9th Circuit) Case No. 12-16514, has potentially far-reaching implications for what is deemed to be an unlawful professional restraint in violation of California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:19 am
Likewise it does not require employers to pay for dependent coverage. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Last summer, a Manhattan federal court refused to enforce several non-compete clauses against a group of former employees in a New York employment dispute. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Last summer, a Manhattan federal court refused to enforce several non-compete clauses against a group of former employees in a New York employment dispute. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:50 am
appeared first on LaBovick Law Group. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:50 am
appeared first on LaBovick Law Group. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
Many of the above exemptions that more broadly apply to farm workers do not apply to workers in these groups. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:57 am
I-9 Employer Handbook DOs and DONTS Potential drawbacks MVP Law Group would like to thank everyone who contributed a question or comment. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:46 am
--Court: Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth DistrictOpinion Date: 9/8/09Cite: The Rochester Buckhart Action Group v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 8:48 am
Under Specialty Healthcare, if a union petitioned for an election among a particular group of employees, those employees shared a community of interest among themselves, and the employer took the position that the smallest appropriate unit had to include employees excluded from the proposed unit, the Board would not find the petitioned-for unit inappropriate unless the employer proved that the excluded employees shared an “overwhelming” community of interest… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:44 am
In April, Seyfarth Shaw authored an amicus brief in the case on behalf of Employers Group, California Employment Law Council, and the California Chamber of Commerce urging the Court of Appeal to decide the rounding issue in line with the DOL and DLSE’s position. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 12:52 pm
This could fracture workplaces as different employee sub-groups negotiate their own agreements with the same employer. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:08 pm
If you or someone you know has been injured because of an employer's neglect and abuse, please call our law offices. [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 2:30 am
And they were very attractive to employers because they had authorization to legally work in the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
In a suit filed under the FLSA and Oregon wage and hour law, a federal court found that Jack in the Box was not the plaintiffs’ “joint employer” after the date it franchised several corporate-owned restaurants to franchisee Northwest Group, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
., a Member in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC's Labor and Employment Practice Group. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
The controversy started when Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, a grocery distributor, had a problem with someone who was going to the bathroom in the warehouse. [read post]
