Search for: "Ed"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 63,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
Novak has an op-ed entitled "The Democrats' Partial Pro-Lifers. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:49 am
Guests for the program include Princeton Professor Ed Felten and the University of Chicago Law School's Randy Picker. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) to refuse its application.Claims 4 and 5 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):4. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:22 pm
TO DISCUSS YOUR WILL CONTEST WITH AN ATTORNEY, PLEASE CALL ED WALLIS AT (901) 527-2125. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:41 pm
Thanks to this great post at Grits, I saw this notable op-ed in the Los Angeles Times by James Q. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 11:01 am
The ED concluded therefrom that there was lack of inventive step […]. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
The applicant filed an appeal after the Examining Division (ED) had rejected the application under consideration.The Board found claim 1 of the main request not to comply with the requirements of A 84 because one essential feature was missing from the independent claims. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
Ed. note: This post is by Will Meyerhofer, a former Sullivan & Cromwell attorney turned psychotherapist. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:10 am
Ed. note: This post is by Will Meyerhofer, a former Sullivan & Cromwell attorney turned psychotherapist. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:19 am
Expect some version of the following exchange: [Ed. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
But he did get his op-ed into the Times. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:08 pm
(Perhaps one of the drawbacks of the op-ed format.) [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
Every second, on average, 6,000 tweets are published on Twitter – that’s 500 million tweets per day. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This appeal deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the application as filed read:1. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
In this case the Examining Division (ED) had refused the application for lack of inventive step only in view of common knowledge and without any reference to prior art documents.The Board set aside the decision and remitted the case, expressing its dissatisfaction with the way in which the ED had proceeded:[1] A 113 (1) EPC 1973 provides that decisions of the EPO may only be based on grounds or evidence on which the parties concerned have had an opportunity to present their… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:53 pm
Friend-of-the-BLPB Ben Edwards penned a nifty op ed that was published yesterday (Sunday, November 26) in The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 11:55 am
This week, Sloan Speck (Colorado) reviews a new work by Ajay Mehrotra (American Bar Foundation; Northwestern), Fiscal Forearms: Taxation as the Lifeblood of the Modern Liberal State, in The Many Hands of the State: Theorizing the Complexities of Political Authority and Social Control (Kimberly Morgan & Ann Orloff eds., Cambridge... [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:14 pm
[by Rick Bales; this is a cross-post from today's op-ed at TaxProf Blog] As has been much-described elsewhere, the Department of Education has, for a variety of reasons (mostly related to admitting unqualified students and low bar pass rates), cut... [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
New York Times op-ed: A Costly and Unjust Perk for Financiers, by Lynn Forester de Rothschild (CEO, E. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
Eds. [read post]
