Search for: "FIRST MERIT"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 32,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
Plaintiffs, therefore, have no First Amendment claim that is not either lacking in merit or that has not already been rejected by the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The public policy asserted by Money was the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am
Alan (Trounson, CIRM's president) visited all of the first round applicants. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:52 am
First, bonuses fall. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:31 am
Under res judicata, subsequent claims are precluded if: (1) the judgment in the first suit was on the merits or final; (2) the parties in the first and second suit are either identical or in privity; and (3) the claims in the second suit arise "out of the same transaction or series of transactions" as the claims in the first suit. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
They correctly note that even though Governor Gray Davis unsuccessfully raised a one-person, one-vote claim among others in 2003 before being recalled, the state high court denied review without setting any precedent on the merits. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:26 pm
That also shows they likely agree with the plaintiffs on the merits. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:36 pm
It is the first time any federal court has allowed any of Trump’s three travel bans to go into effect. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
The selection of the proper law cannot fairly be termed a “merits-intensive determination. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:19 am
On the merits of appellant’s case, the court first determined that Roberson failed to show that he was prejudiced by the defective notice as required under Government Code § 65010(b). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:15 am
First, the assessment is often made on less than the entire record. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Hyatt filed in 1995, the patent examiners issued first office actions in 1995 or 1996, and Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
Prof Miller: Discussion of Gov’t Brief; Patent Hawk: Becoming Less Obvious; Patent Hawk: Hindsight Problem; Buchanan: "[O]nce again, patent reform has left the Capitol and walked across First Street to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
Was this language crafted to fudge the issue, so that some can claim the “not insubstantial” is a tougher standard than likelihood of success on the merits (admittedly my first read of the language) and others suggesting that is an easier standard (as in, “not insubstantial” means “not frivolous”). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
The district judge, having ruled that it had no possible merit, did not consider the other factors, besides the merits, that are germane to the decision whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 4:59 pm
United States and First American Financial v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:36 am
First, what bet exactly will Delaware offer? [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:40 am
ALJ Gildea first addressed Respondents’ motion to supplement their notice of prior art and discovery responses. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:11 pm
The time-bar determination, therefore, is not akin to either the non-initiation or preliminary-only merits determinations for which unreviewability is common in the law, in the latter case because the closely related final merits determination is reviewable. [read post]
