Search for: "Leaders v. State"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 9:30 am
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
In Zhang v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
At the same time, incrementalism reinforces the corrosive nature of constitutional veneration: by placing the blame with our leaders, the Constitution appears blameless. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
By following this guide, law firm leaders can not only become more preemptive in evaluating cybersecurity risk exposure, but they can also successfully elevate cybersecurity from an ancillary IT concern to a core enterprise-wide risk management item, at the top of a law firm executive committee’s oversight agenda. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Most legal commentators would agree with the general proposition that a U.S. citizen who is a senior leader of al Qaeda and a terrorist, personally and actively involved in plotting from an overseas, remote location to kill innocent American men, women and children, and who cannot feasibly be captured or arrested, is an appropriate target for lethal force by the U.S. government. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
Businesses and their owners or management leaders making these decisions should confirm that they fully understand these responsibilities and take appropriate steps to ensure their fulfillment before establishing or maintaining a group health plan to avoid exposing their business, its management or owners or others to unexpected and often substantial liabilities that can result from violation of these requirements. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
The 11th edition features new coverage of events that have dominated the headlines, such as the battle to fill Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat and the landmark decision for marriage equality in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
The affidavit stated: On the day of the accident, I was employed as a crew leader and the victim was assigned to my crew and was under my supervision. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:26 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:10 am
Liberals Use Supreme Court Gun Case to Bolster Other Rights
Legal Times
The Supreme Court's ruling in D.C. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am
The PTAB relied on CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
