Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 11,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
As a lawyer, she was probably best known for arguing United Church of Christ v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:55 pm
United States, 556 F.3d 1244, 1250 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
For the jury to have found Katakis guilty of obstruction of justice, it had to find that the government proved each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:[1] that defendant Katakis knowingly altered, destroyed, or concealed electronic records or documents; [2] that defendant Katakis acted with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence an investigation that he either knew of or contemplated; and [3] that the investigation was about a matter by or within the jurisdiction of the… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
State, supra (quoting Thomas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Medellin apparently raised the consular consultation issue in his second state habeas corpus petition in the light of the Avena decision from the International Court of Justice at the Hague, which directed United States courts to review the cases of several dozen convicts who alleged they were denied advice of their right to consular consultations under the Vienna Convention. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:30 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm
(After all, the Court unanimously dismissed the TVPA claim in Mohamed v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
United States, No. 2011-5059 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:29 pm
Here is the abstract: When the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
What are we to make of a state that enacts an obviously unconstitutional law? [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm
I was really shocked when I found out that the staff of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) felt forced to bring a motion to compel Apple to provide answers to some of its questions. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Gore (1996) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:55 am
Circuit's opinion in Parhat v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
