Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6641 - 6660 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm by JD Hull
I don't mean a go-through-the-motions lawyer, a tell-you-what-the law-is lawyer (dipstick variety) or even a yeoman lawyer here. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Antonin Pribetic for a pointer to the case of the day, Lantheus Med. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:56 am by MBettman
I don’t know why, but we all seem to love lists. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 6:56 pm
Code § § 51, 52, which provides, in § 51(b):All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, or sexual orientation are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:28 am by Russell Knight
How does a new spouse’s income affect maintenance, child support and other matters after an Illinois divorce? [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:32 am by Tamara Robb
  When childless couples divorce, they have one particular luxury that divorcing parents don’t have: they don’t have to deal with each other ever again! [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:46 pm
Merpel cautions: Kitchin J has a good track record so far, so don't bank on the appeal succeeding.More bad news for BOTOX: you can remove the appearance of wrinkles with tiny plastic crystals suspended in bovine collagen.All about botulism hereBotulinium toxin and biological warfare here [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 2:45 pm
 The esteemed abolitionist had forged a strong working relationship with fellow abolitionists and white women suffragists, including Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. [read post]
30 May 2013, 1:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (This is purely historical/path-dependent, as far as I can tell; neither state requires knowledge of falsity for core liability, so application of Rule 9(b) depends on whether courts think terms like “fraudulent” etc. matter more than whether an actual common law fraud type claim is being brought; the court’s not wrong to cite differing precedents from different coasts, but I don’t think there’s an actual rationale underlying that… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There’s a lot of convergence b/t politics, cultural identity expressed by product choice, etc. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Fast Act S-K Simplification: Don’t Forget the New “Description of Securities” Exhibit! [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 10:08 pm
Kugle violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(a), 3.01, 3.03(a)(1) and (a)(2), 3.04(a), 4.01(a) and (b), 5.01(a), and 8.04(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(8). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
In the end, ignoring 100(b) may be the largest problem with the machine or transformation test, which requires that all processes be tied to a machine or transform matter (and I do mean all - the Federal Circuit recently applied it to a method of treating patients with drugs). [read post]