Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6641 - 6660 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm by Orin Kerr
It doesn't matter if the government could not have gained access to the data any other way. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:50 pm by Stephen Honig
Then let us say A is a bad licensee and doesn’t pay royalties. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Thomas Surmanski
This reverse onus isn’t proposed for any other offence, nor is there any reasoning cited as to why exclude this singular type of offence despite the obvious looming s. 11(e) issue. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
Obama decision, which “held that ‘[t]he determination of when hostilities have ceased is a political decision, and we defer to the Executive’s opinion on the matter, at least in the absence of an authoritative congressional declaration purporting to terminate the war,’” as well as the D.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:38 am by Raymond T. Waid
., as Owner of the M/T ATHOS I, Nos. 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868 (3d Cir. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:38 am by Raymond T. Waid
., as Owner of the M/T ATHOS I, Nos. 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868 (3d Cir. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:23 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
If your spouse died during the year and you file a joint return, you generally can claim your spouse’s personal exemption (remember this only matters for the 2017 tax year since there are no personal exemptions in 2018). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The opinion here addressed only the portion of the employees’ motion that seeks class certification under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by eileen peck
He also said he would refrain from further comment on the matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:05 am by Nico Cordes
"b) "As the last amendments do not change the scope of the claimed subject-matter (when compared to the previous examined set of claims), the objections underlying the present decision were already known to the applicant. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:05 am by Nico Cordes
"b) "As the last amendments do not change the scope of the claimed subject-matter (when compared to the previous examined set of claims), the objections underlying the present decision were already known to the applicant. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The SEC explicitly recognizes the importance of “tone at the top,” as demonstrated by one of its more specific and impactful directives, requiring that so-called executive certifications regarding the design and effectiveness of disclosure controls now encompass cybersecurity matters (such as certifications made pursuant to the Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as well as Item 307 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(a) of Exchange Act Form 20-F). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:07 pm by Daniel Shaviro
It would be unsurprising if I agreed to (b) in lieu of (a), in part or even wholly by reason of the federal income tax savings. [read post]