Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6641 - 6660
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
Although I agree with Mark Tushnet that institutional pluralism is needed, I worry that we often reinvent wheels separately without learning from one another. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:37 am
(Internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:37 am
(Internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:36 am
Mark Perry, on behalf of Lucia, opened by stating that SEC ALJs are officers under all the Court's precedents. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
The defense made several additional arguments for the abatement, relying upon the factors in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Over to Christopher: "It’s well known that at least since eBay Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Canadian Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale stated, “There would appear to be no national security connection,” while Toronto Police Chief Mark Saunders said, “it’s very clear just from a general perspective to say that the actions definitely look deliberate. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Maatman, Jr. and Mark W. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am
In the General Court Nestle failed to show use throughout the EU, not just in a substantial part of it, and therefore the mark was invalidated.A Kit Kat KounterfeitPer the decision in August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU set the bar for the acquisition of distinctive character through use as requiring "…evidence… that [the mark] has acquired, through the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am
In the General Court Nestle failed to show use throughout the EU, not just in a substantial part of it, and therefore the mark was invalidated.A Kit Kat KounterfeitPer the decision in August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU set the bar for the acquisition of distinctive character through use as requiring "…evidence… that [the mark] has acquired, through the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
When the justices started their last week of arguments this morning with Lucia v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:17 am
Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles, C-361/15, on the irrelevance of the sector of use to determine novelty and individual character), but also 3d marks (cf. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Marine Corps worked closely with the Japanese Self-Defense Force in helping develop its doctrine and training and also participated in the April 9 military exercise marking the brigade’s activation. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
