Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 6641 - 6660 of 22,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Terry Briscoe and Tim O'Connell
You may not like – or decide to adopt – the stance that the General Counsel has taken on these policies, but at least you (sort of) know his position on many handbook policies. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 6:27 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Arizona legislators are a bill that if adopted, would ban and render unenforceable agreements by employers or others from entering into confidentiality or other agreements that restrict the disclosure of allegations or other information about sexual harassment or sexual assault. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 11:42 am by Sourabh Gupta
Be that as it may, this Article 121 interpretation has so far stood the jurisprudential test of time, in part because the subject matter has not featured in a subsequent contentious case. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:10 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Article 3 of the Statute provides a remarkable rule for disputes in civil and commercial matters falling outside the territorial scope of European law, i.e. when the defendant is not domiciled within the jurisdiction of a Contracting state. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
An interesting case from the First Department yesterday sheds some light on the matter - Matter of Elvin G., 2008 NY Slip Op 00555. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:09 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
This was demonstrated recently in a ruling issued in a New York medical malpractice matter in which the court declined to adopt the defendant hospital’s assertion that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm by James Hamilton
The company adopted the calculation without change and included the overstated EPS in its annual report. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm by James Hamilton
The company adopted the calculation without change and included the overstated EPS in its annual report. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
  The matter came before the court following an appeal from the earlier ruling of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A very interesting case handed down Monday, In the Matter of D.I.S. and Sidman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:22 am by Brian Hall
The supervisor then told management about the conversation, which resulted in the charging party being summoned to discuss the matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The majority adopted Judge Hartz’s view, including that no attorney would in the future file a removal notice in the Tenth Circuit without evidence of the amount-in-controversy. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by David M. McLain
District Court for the District of Colorado pursuant to federal subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am by Erin Connell
Judge Margret McKeown, joined by Judges Richard Tallman and Mary Murguia, criticizes the majority in her concurrence for “embrac[ing] a rule not adopted by any other circuit—prior salary may never be used, even in combination with other factors, as a defense under the Equal Pay Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am by Erin Connell
Judge Margret McKeown, joined by Judges Richard Tallman and Mary Murguia, criticizes the majority in her concurrence for “embrac[ing] a rule not adopted by any other circuit—prior salary may never be used, even in combination with other factors, as a defense under the Equal Pay Act. [read post]