Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6641 - 6660 of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2008, 5:17 am
The report states that, on or about June 11, 2005, John McKay, a resident of San Mateo County, initiated an online purchase of fluoxetine (generic Prozac) on `www. usanetrx. com,' an interactive Web site located outside of the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 337(a), only the United States can enforce the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
In that setting, the United States admitted that the judge's conduct was improper. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Out-of-state companies with California employees are likely the brightest blips on the DFEH’s screen. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
The United States asks us to affirm this sentence. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Eichler, Jr.Case number: 12-cv-10692 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 11, 2015 7/31/2015 10/29/2015 2015-75 SEC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by Gregory Forman
Superior Court of California, County of Marin, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that in-state service was, by itself, sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am by Ron Coleman
True enough, when we got the judgment for seven (theoretical) figures in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]