Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
In State of Punjab v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
The United States avoided a ruling on the merits of this issue in Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am
As Justice Cooper wrote in Baidoo, “[A] concept should not be rejected simply because it is novel or nontraditional. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
Constitutional law » United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
See, e.g., Gavaldon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
From United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:58 pm
Just last term, in Vermont v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Supreme Court has already heard arguments this term in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
”The case is Rentmeester v Nike Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Though the committee cites the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am
An end of sorts finally arrived in June, when Manhattan’s Appellate Division – First Department issued Fuks v Rakia Assocs., 228 AD3d 501 [1st Dept 2024]. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Life Investors, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 313, 317 [223 Cal.Rptr. 539], superseded by statute as stated in Cooper v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:34 pm
Clark and Dixon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
