Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6641 - 6660
of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 3:07 pm
Session 3 (Room 300) Presenter: Zachary R. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Yet Thermtron permits review for issues of far less significance and impact—such as a district court’s discretionary decision whether to remand state law claims after all federal claims have been resolved—because such remands are not governed by § 1447(c). [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:45 am
Matter of Miriam M. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
" ABI Asset Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:59 am
C.) [read post]
19 May 2022, 7:05 am
Whitehouse P, Gandy S, Saini V, George DR, Larson EB, Alexander GC, Avorn J, Brownlee S, Camp C, Chertkow H, Fugh-Berman A, Howard R, Kesselheim A, Langa KM, Perry G, Richard E, Schneider L. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:10 am
c. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 10:37 am
Oman, "United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:08 pm
[H][L][W] Pryor, C. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:24 pm
R. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Tamburlaine and Henry V”R. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
R. 9.9(c), all parties must receive a defendant’s memorandum in opposition and supporting affidavits at least eight calendar days before the hearing on a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am
Harris III, of Austin, David C. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:39 pm
Stumpf v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Emergency Jurisdiction Continues Under UCCJEA for More than Three Years Where Family Court Not Satisfied With Steps to Protect Children Taken by Home State of New Mexico Court In Matter of Bridget Y, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6848352 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.), a 3-2 decison, the primary issue raised was whether Family Court properly exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction over the children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law 76-c (3). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
(2) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and serious bodily injury results and is a crime of the fourth degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and bodily injury results [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:23 pm
Yesterday the ECJ delivered its judgment in Case C-468/06 Lelos v GSK, a reference from the Greek competition authorities concerning a failure by GSK to fully meet orders submitted to it by Greek wholesales which GSK deemed to be well in excess of demand on the Greek market.Although it is an abuse of a dominant position under Art.82 of the EC Treaty for an undertaking to refuse to supply wholesalers in order to put a stop to parallel importation, an undertaking can stop supplying… [read post]
