Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 7,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2008, 3:52 pm
Governor of Michigan, which was decided by the Michigan Supreme Court on May 7th. [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:59 am
In his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:41 pm
For the last two years, SCHR has represented a class of people on the registry in Whitaker v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:24 pm
Governor of Michigan (thanks, Prawfsblawg!) [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
In an illustration of legislative sausage making at its finest, the legislature passed and yesterday the Governor signed into law, a bill that gives the insurance industry and the trial lawyers pieces of what they wanted this year, over the opposition of the State Insurance Commissioner. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:01 pm
For the last two years, SCHR has represented a class of people on the registry in Whitaker v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:46 am
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:50 am
The Great Turnback of grants and regulatory discretion to the states was a product of two former governors -- Reagan and Clinton -- with such notable (or infamous, if you are so inclined) measures as TANF, expansion of section 1115 Medicaid waivers, Lopez/Morrison/Gonzales v Oregon judicial vindication of state power, etc. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:14 am
Senate Bill 6306 was introduced and passed by BOTH houses of the state legislature in a lightning-quick five days last June. [read post]
13 May 2008, 4:55 pm
On May 7, 2008, the Michigan Supreme Court in National Pride At Work v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:44 am
In federal court, the governor of Montana, who was the named defendant, argued that the governor and the state were immune from suit in federal court under the rarely referenced Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 May 2008, 10:43 pm
This changed on February 12, 2008, when the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:43 am
The Michigan Supreme Court finally came down with their opinion in National Pride at Work v Governor of Michigan. [read post]
7 May 2008, 4:39 pm
National Pride at Work v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:48 am
In 1987, in McCleskey v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 9:04 am
We have yet to hear from Senate President Codey or Governor Corzine regarding the progress of eminent domain reform. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:28 am
Updating this entry yesterday on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Joseph Bonner et al v. [read post]
