Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 45,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking decision in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:57 pm
See, e.g., Matthews v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
(Title 26 of the United States Code would be a good deal shorter if the unwise tax laws could be purged by the judiciary.) [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
The two people on the go-fast boat (with the cocaine) are clearly from Ecuador, and the closest landmass is Ecuador. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:57 am
In Graham v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Access to abortion has been decimated in the United States since June when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Ryan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
Chief Judge Kozinzki from the Ninth Circuit, dissenting from denial of a motion for en banc hearing in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:25 am
(FEGS) had a contract with the State of New York to provide housing for people with a history of mental illness. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:14 am
Fletcher said, it seemed that Georgia was prepared to honor the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Windsor and Burwell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Vega v Smith , 66 NY2d 130, and Matter of Gray v Adduci , 73 NY2d 741. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Vega v Smith , 66 NY2d 130, and Matter of Gray v Adduci , 73 NY2d 741. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, "repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a ... reflected a strong legislative policy promoting transparency of police disciplinary records and eliminated any claim of confidentiality in them" (see People v Castellanos, 72 Misc 3d 371)). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:53 am
They cannot, however, deliberately endanger people. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:07 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
