Search for: "State v. So"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 117,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
When Congress Giveth, is the Dormant Commerce Clause Taken Away?--Free Speech Coalition v. Shurtleff
7 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
by Ethan Ackerman Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:48 am
State, 24 So. 3d 671 (Fla. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Well, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the District Court’s well-crafted opinion in Tibble v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:33 pm
In so doing, the Court - at least in the view of Justice Alito, who filed a dissent - created an exception to the dormant Commerce Clause for state and local regulations that discriminate in favor of publicly owned entities. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
(See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 7:05 am
So I think this opinion is pro-guns, not pro-Internet. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Respectfully, this is not so. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
Lopez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am
” (quoting Ruiz v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
See In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 634 F.3d 187, 194, 199 (2d Cir. 2011) (stating that “Stolt-Nielsen states that parties cannot be forced to engage in a class arbitration absent a contractual agreement to do so. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Because the Court says so. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
” Finally, the government argues that the withheld documents are not the “working law” of the government, but rather, constitute confidential legal advice and so were properly withheld under FOIA Exemption 5. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
Davis, 480 So.2d 625, 627 (Fla.1985); see also Webb, 899 So.2d at 346; Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So.2d 536, 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Lopez-Infante v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
Evans nor Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm
Hotchkiss, 972 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Fort v. [read post]
