Search for: "State v. So"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 117,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 10:50 am
-Federal v. [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
Doing so commonly will require discovery, acknowledged the court. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
" Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.United States, 371 U. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am
” Department of Transp. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:53 am
The ICI’s latest comment letter said the Commission should do more to ensure that the sequencing of effective and compliance dates in multiple ESG-themed rulemakings work in tandem so that portfolio disclosures can be made based on data from public companies whose shares are held in those portfolios.Sequencing. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
If you fail to do so, we the people will have to fight a bloody revolution/civil war to throw off an illegitimate deep-state/Chinese puppet regime. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:01 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The power to do so would be based on an “independent state legislature” theory that cites the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:30 am
Bremerton School Dist. and West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
Can the Lanham Act apply to the conduct of foreign entities occurring entirely outside the United States and, if so, what is the test? [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
Can the Lanham Act apply to the conduct of foreign entities occurring entirely outside the United States and, if so, what is the test? [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
So far as “cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance” was concerned, it had been held in McEleney v Ministry of Defence [2017] UKET S/4105347/2017 that a belief in Scottish independence and how Scotland should be governed was sufficiently serious to meet that test. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
v=2pp17E4E-O8. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 1:41 pm
As Florida’ Fourth District Court of Appeal explained in Zodiac Records Inc. v. [read post]
