Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 6641 - 6660 of 21,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2018, 7:38 am by Rachel Sandler
Alexander’s complaint is yet another lawsuit testing to what extent tattoos are subject to copyright law. [read post]
1 May 2018, 6:30 am by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
Welch already had a valid DOT medical certification at the time of his application; successfully completed a second DOT medical exam at the company’s request; and successfully completed the company’s driving test. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:05 pm by Randazza
The California plaintiff argued that Florida law should be applied. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:53 pm by Reeves Law Firm
In that case, the plaintiff said that there was no universal method of testing the safety of e-cigarettes. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:11 am by Steven Cohen
Jaybe will be allowed to testify on a cognitive test that he administered to the plaintiff as it is the type that he would normally administer as a rehabilitation counselor. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Apr. 20, 2018)The Association (counterclaim plaintiff) sued the Foundation (counterclaim defendant), alleging that the Foundation’s purchase of Asssociation trademarks as search engine keywords and use of the two-word name “Alzheimer’s Foundation” constituted trademark infringement and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Sam Brunson
Still, section 119(d) was meant to expand the convenience-of-the-employer test. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:50 am by Richard Hunt
Both lawsuits were brought by the same disabled plaintiff, a disability rights advocate associated with a large plaintiff’s firm. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:24 am by Carl Neff
  The Court applied the Rales test for determining demand futility, given that plaintiff did not challenge specific decisions by the company’s board of directors. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 11:02 pm by Bill Marler
An epidemiological investigation and product testing conducted by IDIA and IDPH, along with the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) and the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
”  The court also found that, for standing purposes, plaintiffs have a First Amendment interest in sock puppeting, or harmless misrepresenting their identities in order to audit test websites. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Chinmayi Sharma
A plurality of the court would proceed to apply the test it established in Sosa: (1) Can the plaintiff demonstrate that the alleged violation is “of a norm that is specific, universal, and obligatory? [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:24 am by umbrella
The legal test to determine causation is called the “but for” test. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:03 am by Sharifi Firm, APC
The court began by noting that, when analyzing causation, California courts use the “substantial factor test. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:19 am
The plaintiff asked for removal of the image from the school’s website and for damages. [read post]