Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
Another case heard by the Supreme Court today was Barber v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
But the Heller ruling did spawn a bunch of litigation, including, of course, McDonald v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
She woke when she heard the baby whimpering. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:52 am
The court heard that Matthew Collinson was driving too fast on a single lane road, at a minimum of twice the 30 mph speed limit, when he hit an oncoming vehicle. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
The Court also remanded People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:01 pm
The case is Davis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
Although there is no question that a trial court "necessarily has broad discretion to control and restrict the scope of the voir dire examination" (People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135, 140, rearg denied 29 NY2d 670, cert denied 405 US 995; see People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199), we conclude under the circumstances of this case that the court erred in failing to permit defense counsel to conduct further questioning of the prospective juror to determine whether she… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision Roper v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 pm
Ironically, that rule comes, in part, from the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in the case of People v Cress (yet another Battle Creek area murder case). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:25 pm
We’ve all heard them, seen them even. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:16 am
In this climate of hate, those crying out for acceptance cannot be heard. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:30 am
(Malcolm v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
It is my respectful submission that my conduct falls well short of the conduct required to meet the test in Grimwade v Meagher, that is conduct which might make it appropriate for me to be removed as counsel in this matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Tal v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
The suit was heard by the Honorable James C. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:37 pm
About 1-3,000 people have already written.I have just heard that the Government has already rushed through the First Reading in the Commons and the Second Reading is being scheduled. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:20 pm
The "The Will of the People: The Supreme Court and the American Public" is one such example. [read post]
