Search for: "Thomas View" Results 6641 - 6660 of 12,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
And what to make of Justice Thomas’s dissent? [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:19 am by Jake S. Truscott and Adam Feldman
Will we continue to see the justices use their time during arguments to express their own views in addition to asking questions? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
His concurrence did not seriously question the majority view that Roe was not based on a good law. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
In its view, the first stage, defined in Regulation 55(1), allows the Trial Chamber to change the legal characterization of the facts "in its decision under article 74 [of the Rome Statute]. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
The creation of the Commission and the Chief Justice’s views on it were covered by me here. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, then-Judge Kavanaugh took a narrow view of Turner in his dissent in the D.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:06 am by Alan Neff
Justice Thomas declined to recuse himself from that case. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:37 pm by Cory Andrews
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, dissented from the Court’s decision to deny review of Alderman’s case. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
—The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Alito wrote the opinion for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice, Justices Kavanaugh and Breyer in full, and Justice Thomas in part. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
(Justices Scalia and Thomas joined each other’s opinions fully, and Justice Alito joined portions of Justice Scalia’s and Thomas’s opinions.) [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For his part, Justice Thomas for the majority acknowledges that “some plaintiffs, such as [Mr.] [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:31 am by Miriam Seifter
” Justice Alito’s gloss on the majority’s opinion suggests that he views T-Mobile South’s win as an especially narrow one. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” It is hard to know how to reconcile those two views about the federal judiciary’s role in voting-rights cases. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We can assume that Ginsburg and Thomas voted to hear the Gamble case; because it takes four votes to grant review in the Supreme Court, at least two other justices must also be interested in reconsidering the separate sovereigns exception.Original Meaning and Stare DecisisIt is not always easy to discern a justice’s substantive view based on the questions he or she asks at oral argument. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Bijal Shah
First, the political appointment of administrative law judges (ALJs) favors adjudicators whose views align with those of the President. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:29 am by Victoria Kwan
Footage of Sotomayor’s talk can be viewed online. [read post]