Search for: "UNited States v. White"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 7,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19] Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths annually. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
The veteran Guardian journalist Michael White has written a thoughtful piece on the celebrity threesome super injunction case. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am
When Corporations Are the Criminalizers Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have promoted private-sector investment in Central America on the theory that it will improve standards of living and stem the flow of migrants to the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
" A prior panel precedent is "undermined," we explained in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Whilst PACE stated that Samples “may be retained” the ACPO guidelines were strict, mandating that Samples “must be retained save in exceptional circumstances”. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Chartered in 1864, Gallaudet University has a storied history as the oldest college in the United States for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/7jrRWbT4Zu -> Supreme Court ruling in CLS Bank v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm
And that is that the abolition of the United States Constitution is not something which necessarily occurs overnight. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]