Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
(v) were 32Red's Community marks and United Kingdom trade marks valid;? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Hidden Lakes Development v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:51 pm
On January 19, 2012, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its December 6, 2011 opinion in Malpass v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm
Golan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
” US W., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
It also refers to the laws enacted on a national level in Germany which are a consequence of the new European instruments. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
(The full opinion in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Upon receiving a file from the CIA with this and other information about the Malaysia meeting immediately following the 9/11 attack, Soufan ran to a restroom and threw up, despondent over what he might have done with this information had it been granted to him when he had asked. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:06 am
(The full opinion in Maples v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
In Golan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:24 am
In a ruling on January 13, 2012 - in Scott, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:17 am
The case is U.S.A v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Commitments of funds, whether through grants or loans or loan guarantees or tax breaks, are made through public policy choices. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Commitments of funds, whether through grants or loans or loan guarantees or tax breaks, are made through public policy choices. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
Nov. 14, 2011) (granting, in part, and denying, in part, motions to dismiss predicated upon purported noncompliance with Administrative Order No. 12); Willis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
Nosal found that an employee may be liable under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) for violations of an employer’s computer use policies (the court has since granted en banc review and heard oral arguments in December 2011) and there remains a circuit split on the applicability of the CFAA in the workplace. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
"[T]he Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure provides that a 'new trial may be granted in any case if there is good ground therefor, except as otherwise provided by law,'" the court reasoned, and "after reviewing the record before us, we find good and valid reasons for a new trial. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:46 am
The Court of Appeal partially granted Mr Othman’s appeal. [read post]
