Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 6661 - 6680 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2009, 10:39 am
  I am not an art critic nor have credentials from the University of Chicago School of Art, but I can “call ‘em like I see ‘em” and the site does not speak to me like, say, this one or this one. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
[i] [i]  For a more detailed discussion of the GAO bid protest process, see U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:41 am
Having seen comments on forums about the Deposit Protection Service refusing to accept deposits from landlords, for example if the money is paid over more than 14 days after it is paid to them (putting them in default of the scheme, unable to evict tenants under s21, and vulnerable to being sued for the ‘fine' of 3 x the deposit sum), I thought I had better check this out with the company itself.However I am… [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
X needs assurance that I support X's agenda: If the law says that X cannot use contributions as evidence of my loyalty, then the law risks looking asinine. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:39 am
IRA X, through Company P, does not have the ability to surrender, convert or sell the life insurance policy. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 7:23 am
Since more recent articles seem to now be behind a subscription wall, I am unsure how long this list will be available for free. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Or does the phonyness only apply when no consensus is reached on what the law is? [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 4:15 pm
As an aside, why does the "X=Christ" translation only occur here? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:19 pm
But rather because a change in such settings seems untoward.Say, for example, we're the Supreme Court, and we issue a 5-4 decision in favor of X against Y. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:16 am
Sprinkle mixture into a 13 x 9 x 2-inch greased baking pan and with the bottom of something flat (I use my metal measuring cup) press evenly onto bottom. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 7:43 am
  I have to admit that's the last thing I expected. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:30 am
If the hip is dislocated on X-ray examination, reduction of the hip does not increase stability, but may increase contracture, and a stiff, located joint is worse than a freely moving dislocated one. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
So what does the court do? [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 2:26 pm
BALLOT Vote for three: X John Doe X Sister Jane Doe Barney Smith X Fred Jones QUESTION: Regarding married couples on the board, would this also apply to a brother and his sister, living in two townhomes situated right next to each other? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:27 pm
UPDATE: Jerry Pournelle: “I have not seen Lori since the first flight of the DC/X, which is some years ago. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
  (The PDC appears to have backed off from this decision [link].)Finally, the article talks about Section 230, which I'm a fan of, but which is bad-mouthed every once in a while. [read post]