Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 6661 - 6680 of 8,737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This is true enough, but it suggests that the essence of the anti-delegation norm is not that vested power can’t be delegated, but that delegations of power that are hard to reclaim or undo are particularly problematic.As I have explored at more length in academic scholarship, this possibility is supported by seminal work done at the beginning of the last century by Professors Patrick W. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
A `[t]respass alone does not qualify, but there must be conjoined with that . . . an attempt to find something or to obtain information. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of the denial of the motion to dismiss by noting that “[w]e review the trial court's ruling on a question of law de novo. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter for further proceedings.State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:34 am by FHH Law
 The idea there is that, the more interchangeable the blocks are, the less important it will be to bidders that the particular frequencies up for auction can’t be known at the time of the auction – since whatever blocks they may buy will in any event be “interchangeable”. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:30 am by Evelyn Douek, Ed Stein
As the former president of Estonia put it, ‘‘[W]hat they do to us we cannot do to them ... [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm by Bob Bauer
This raises the second question: How much did any of these variations in formal role matter? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For those who don’t have the resources or the language skills to go to Madrid, Minsk, Malabo, or Mogadishu, there are always Madison, Montpelier, or Montgomery! [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291 (1991)  (“[W]e hold that the standard of proof for the dischargeability exceptions in 11 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by Kay Jebelli
  Opportunity-to-Contest Versus ‘Fair’ Outcomes  Not so many years ago, European Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager said that “[w]e don’t need a new rule of fairness in our system. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But context matters, and schools have many mechanisms to discipline students. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:51 am by Susan Brenner
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of his arguments on both issues by noting that [w]e review denials of motions for judgments of acquittal de novo. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
California-related matters — she should have been disqualified from this one as well? [read post]