Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 6661 - 6680 of 18,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2023, 7:06 am by Dan Farber
It was certainly helpful, if only in picking up Justice Kennedy’s crucial vote, to have a state plaintiff in Mass. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:02 am by Administrator
C.J., 2018 MBCA 65; 2019 SCC 8 (38220)  The Chief Justice: “For the reasons of Justice Pfuetzner, we would allow the appeal. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
En l’espèce, la direction de l’établissement a grandement manqué à ses obligations lors de la rencontre avec X et sa mère immédiatement après l’événement. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
The other problem is that its decision in Dobbs reversing Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
D’autre part, les juges doivent gérer l’instance de manière à réduire les délais et à favoriser une saine gestion de l’administration de la justice. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Eric Goldman
We’re not talking about the free speech rights of a janitor with a mop. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:06 pm
We're referring to an educational comic strip (fat .pdf) on unlawful file sharing of music developed by judges and professors to teach students about the law and the courtroom experience. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm by Bill Araiza
  At least some people seem to be listening to Justice Thomas's recent arguments against implied preemption. 2. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Gardens in the Internal Market are big enough for another wolfA little over a year ago we left Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf [reported here in the IPKat] and the Court of Justice of the European Union making it clear to the General Court that 'what it said explicitly was what it meant'. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:57 am
Important but little-remarked fact: Of the eight Justices in the majorities in Goodridge (Massachusetts) and In re Marriage Cases (California), seven of them are Republican appointees. [read post]