Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 8,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
In the litigation realm, that might include the Rainmaker (the person who brings in the client), the Coach (who assembles and manages the team--often called the quarterback transactional matters, though I think "coach" is the more fitting sports analogy), the Strategist (who lays out the grand plan), the Expert (the person or people with subject matter expertise required), and then various Lieutenants (who take charge of individual tasks, from the minor research project to… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
In Muhammad v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
Bartlett v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Richard Grime, a Partner with O’Melveny & Myers and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this article that he wrote along with Katherine Buchanan entitled Implications of the U.K. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
Coleman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:38 am
On one level, the Bates v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:54 pm
A perfect example of this is found in Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
Judge Melvin was the plaintiff in one of the earliest Doe cases to reach the appellate level, Melvin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:22 pm
Though the agency declines for now from making specific decisions about the contents of the disclosure and how is must be posted, the Report lays out a non-exhaustive list of nine major categories of disclosure, including network practices, performance characteristics, and commercial terms, that must be included. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
Blankenship, the plurality lays down a three-part test. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
We are pleased to welcome the latest post in our series of responses to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
So the negotiations will be slowly and quietly trying to lay the groundwork for a major agreement two years from now. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Watch for the decision in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm
The Court of Appeals, Dallas, issued an opinion on November 22, 2010, styled, Frito-Lay, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
See Oakley v. [read post]
