Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm
This is probably one of the most contentious and biggest question marks in employment law in this country. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:07 am
According to the FCC, the rules are intended to prevent only “harmful interference” but not necessarily all “detectable interference. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Removal of markings is achieved by water blasting, shot blasting, sand blasting, chemical removal, or other acceptable means that do not harm the pavement. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:27 am
"has suffered no harm. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:15 am
Here are excerpts from the article: The is a stark reminder of how vulnerable seniors are to harm. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Court of Appeals Agreements - Prenuptial - Validity - Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (3) - Court of Appeals Holds That Because Affidavit of Notary Was Insufficient to Raise a Question of Fact Precluding Summary Judgment the Court Did Not Need to “Definitively Resolve the Question of Whether a Cure Is Possible” Where There Is Omission in the Requisite Language of the Certificate of Acknowledgment, Signatures on the Prenuptial Agreement Are Authentic, and No Claims of… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am
Baxter: PTO Reexamination Decision Trumps Prior Decisions by the Federal Circuit http://t.co/i0NyO2l36t -> State AGs blast Google over YouTube ads for illicit products http://t.co/uSJ9k0zQeP -> Google Glass privacy concerns persist in Congress http://t.co/YDvZStJm7t -> State AGs say Google profits from harmful YouTube videosr http://t.co/XfUml6hzrR -> Apple sued over Siri in patent case in China http://t.co/QkVMRNgcO9 -> No Takedown and Staydown in France… [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:23 am
Any tire marks or damage to the road itself where the accident occurred. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 3:48 am
As people who believe in government, we cannot simply assume that officials are abusing their lawfully granted responsibility and authority to defend our people from violence and harm. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:09 pm
None of them had any observable delays or disabilities and that they were all free from any marks or bruises. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
” The similarity of the marks (setting aside whether this was “use as a mark”) was affected by the fact that a parody needs to conjure up enough of the original to be recognizable. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Baxter: PTO Reexamination Decision Trumps Prior Decisions by the Federal Circuit http://t.co/i0NyO2l36t -> State AGs blast Google over YouTube ads for illicit products http://t.co/uSJ9k0zQeP -> Google Glass privacy concerns persist in Congress http://t.co/YDvZStJm7t -> State AGs say Google profits from harmful YouTube videosr http://t.co/XfUml6hzrR -> Apple sued over Siri in patent case in China http://t.co/QkVMRNgcO9 -> No Takedown and Staydown in France… [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
These conclusions are then available to other scientists who may respond by attempting to replicate the described experiments, conducting their own experiments, or analyzing or refuting the soundness of the experimental design or the validity of the inferences drawn from the results.Id. at *5 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
The association is likely to impair the distinctiveness of the famous mark or likely to harm the reputation of the famous mark. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
“[D]istinct evidence of harm” isn’t a prerequisite. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
This marks the second time NOAA has issued an annual outlook for western Lake Erie. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
This public stance could very well be more about optics than a marked shift in enforcement cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
If something like the Senate bill could emerge, it would mark very substantial progress. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 6:58 am
The consumer vantage point ensures that we protect IP owners only when they have been harmed in the marketplace. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
That doctrine protects a party who is harmed by relying on the promises or actions of another. [read post]
