Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 7,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
P. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:26 pm
Amoco Oil Co., 835 P.2d 534 (Colo. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:20 pm
The distinction of lawyer v. non-lawyer is very artificial. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
A few weeks later, on February 25, a trial judge in Manhattan ruled in Beth R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
And not long after that, on March 25, the Second Department of the Appellate Division, based in Brooklyn, vacated a ruling refusing to recognize a Canadian same-sex marriage by a Nassau County trial judge. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
., a/a/o Marie Boucicaut v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
The catheter case, Riegel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on June 1, 2008:
Sorted by Chapter Law Number. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:12 pm
Graham v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 11:31 pm
X------------------------------------------------------- I know I know plaintiff lawyers... you've read or heard about Macomber v Travelers and/or Spencer v Hartford and been fed the facts and the propaganda- you're thinking "how can I trust these people? [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:13 am
US v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:45 am
Somehow I think the suspension was too long (9 months) for the acts claimed. [read post]
19 May 2008, 11:13 pm
(Lubner, at p. 530.) [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:43 pm
The days of the CT Supreme Court being on the forefront of progressive jurisprudence seem to be long gone. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:00 pm
In Brusseau v. [read post]
