Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6661 - 6680 of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Read on, and we'll explore several important facts about their experiences in the United States. 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962), that the antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, not competitors). [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am by Jennifer González
Today is the 97th anniversary of the 19th amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing women the right to vote. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm by Florian Mueller
For example, one of Apple's patent claims-in-suit has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and another patent-in-suit is from the same patent family whose European member has unanimously been deemed invalid by ten judges. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
I am an attorney, licensed to practice law in California (and also to appear in a number of federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Diamond Foods, Inc.Case number: 14-cv-00123 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: January 9, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-20 SEC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeal– Fourth District, California: People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
– The California Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]