Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 6661 - 6680
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Such payments were made in satisfaction of defendant’s own contractual obligations and did not constitute voluntary payments contemplated under Domestic Relations Law § 236(B) (7) (a) In Aristova v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In the particular case at hand, s73(2)(b) and (3) means that copyright is [was] not infringed "if and to the extent that the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is re-transmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service".The broadcasters appealed Arnold J's decision. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Indeed, as also noted in Response Clothing [IPKat here], with specific regard to the category ‘works of artistic craftmanship’, ‘[c]omplete conformity with art.2 [of the InfoSoc Directive], in particular as interpreted by the CJEU in Cofemel, C-683/17 would exclude any requirement that the [claimant's fabric] has aesthetic appeal’.Third, having regard to the EU Member States, two points are worth raising: (a) those still going around… [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:41 pm
’s behavior constituted a predicate act of harassment under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(b) and (c), and that the entry of a Final Restraining Order (“FRO”) was necessary to protect her from further abuse pursuant to Silver v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am
Specifically, concerning Article 4(2)(b), the protection against disclosing a journalist’s sources had already been considered an essential component of the journalist’s freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR (Goodwin v United Kingdom). [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
7(3)(b), PIPEDA. [10] S. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:41 am
Barnes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Peikes, No. 07-0408 "An order dismissing plaintiff's claims is affirmed where defendant's claims are time-barred and hence subject to dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)" CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE US v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
District Judge Robert B. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Likewise, the Court’s holding in Haddle v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
That's why I stated— The Court: So, it is of record, then. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
Courts have applied at least three tests to expressive works in the trademark context: “(1) the ‘likelihood of confusion’ test [Tenth Circuit]; (b) the ‘alternative avenues’ test [Eighth Circuit]; and (c) the Rogers v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
William C. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
Company A and Company C formed Company B as a joint venture in 2001. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:42 pm
Refusing to allow an employee to withdraw a letter of resignationMatter of Pishotti v New York State Thruway Authority, 38 A.D.3d 1122James Pishotti, a construction equipment operator, had been placed on disciplinary probation by the Thruway Authority for violations of its policy against violence in the workplace. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 8/19/09Cite: Perry v. [read post]
