Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm
Brackeen threatened to take down not only the Indian Child Welfare Act, but vast swaths of federal Indian policy and federal law. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
You feel a pop and shooting pain/ numbness go down your arm. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 3:31 am
That ruling was handed down in Conte v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Glacier Northwest, Inc., dba Calportland v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:59 am
But perhaps no section is more ignored by courts than Section 90(2) - which states that a charitable subscription (a donation) is binding without reliance. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The case is officially known as Florida v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
On the ball as always, Joost told me that the appeal in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:48 pm
In a recent debt settlement case of the Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:13 am
He stated he was not as successful as Professor Nesson. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:03 am
A state law struck down by the state’s highest court was invalid from the outset, so the law switching to special election instead of appointment by the governor did not bring about a change in election law under the Act, and the governor was free to resume the practice of appointment to fill commission vacancies, the Court ruled. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Secretary of State. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 1:02 pm
In 1997, the Supreme Court struck down, in a 7-2 decision, a federal online age-verification law in Reno v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:13 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
In deciding this question, the Court had regard to the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Perinçek v Switzerland [2015] ECHR 907 [26]-[27], which stated that Article 17 only applies ‘on an exceptional basis and in extreme cases’ and, further, that the decisive point under Article 17 is whether ‘the applicant’s statements sought to stir up hatred or violence, and whether by making them he attempted to rely on the Convention to engage in an activity or… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Nellcor Puritan Bennett LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm
Mr Bukovsky pleaded not guilty to the offences and the matter was set down for trial. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 5:29 pm
After the decision in Vita v. [read post]
