Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 6661 - 6680 of 6,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2007, 3:58 am
This Thursday, 19 April, we have two block-busters:Judgment is being given in Case C-273/05 P Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:24 am
B Balloon mortgage: a mortgage that typically offers low rates for an initial period of time (usually 5, 7, or 10) years; after that time period elapses, the balance is due or is refinanced by the borrower. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:31 am
On appeal, they claimed they were entitled to intervene pursuant to W.R.C.P. 24(a)(2) or (b)(2). [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Gifford, Casper, Wyoming; Darin B. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
There's a YouTube case ahead of Viacom, Tur d/b/a L.A. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 2:40 am
Schelhaas, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Elizabeth B. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:15 am
Last Act: 03/26/07 referred to codes LAW / CRIM-PROCA7068 Rivera P -- Provides for the regulation of conduct on school property and at school-authorized activities BLURB : Ed L. school-authorized activity Last Act: 03/27/07 referred to education LAW / CRIM-PROCA7078 Rivera P (MS) -- Imposes longer sentences of imprisonment upon persons convicted of a sex offense, who have a prior conviction of a sex offense committed against a child BLURB : Pen… [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
Taney (1836-1864) $116,461 13 Salmon P. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:27 am
LAW / CORRECTNSS385 YOUNG -- Authorizes the employment of state and local work release inmates by not-for-profit organizations and public service projects BLURB : Cor. work releas. nonprofits Last Act: 03/21/07 2ND REPORT CAL. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
  Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 751 P.2d 923, 936 (Cal. 1988) (citations omitted). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Because we focus here on the cy près distribution of unclaimed settlement proceeds, we note only that following a 1999 federal court trial of state and federal antitrust actions, the district court found against Microsoft, see United States v. [read post]