Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 15,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court decisions: Hughes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:46 pm
To mark that anniversary, in 1950 the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 423 (V) (4 December 1950), inviting all States and interested organizations to observe 10 December of each year as Human Rights Day.As has been the recent practice, for this year the United Nations adopted a specific theme: "Stand Up For Someone's Rights! [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:44 am
Written by Cristina Lavecchia, paralegal, Editor, First Reference In a recent decision (Misetich v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:03 pm
The Washington Court of Appeals recently considered the application of the missing witness jury instruction in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Janis were violated when his counsel entered the “functional equivalent of a guilty plea” to first-degree murder over his objections; (3) whether the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to self-representation under Faretta v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:50 pm
Obama, Al-Adahi v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:54 am
From State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
