Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 16,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2015, 8:21 pm
Zakharov v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
Here the issue concerned Lekkas’ lack of license to practice medicine in New York State although he had been appointed to the position of Assistant Clinical Physician with a State agency. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Again, strong feelings about the Eighth Amendment are likely to flare here. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 am
More on Ledell Lee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Smilow, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
EDENBAUM, D.M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 9:06 pm
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:34 am
(In another case, US v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
In Simmons v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:46 pm
Indeed, some years ago the International Court of Justice had found a violation of the VCCR in relation to a group of people of whom Garcia was a member in the case of Avena v United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
The court followed Georgia (State Farm v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:26 pm
D. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
