Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 6661 - 6680 of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Eric Goldman
The litigation’s only apparent connection to this District — and to the United States — is through the defendant. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:01 am by Philip Miles
North American Stainless, the United States Supreme Court established that Title VII third-party retaliation claims exist. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by The Complex Litigator
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm by The Complex Litigator
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm by DMLP Staff
Medinger Source of Law: United StatesLegal Claims: OtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Counsel: Ezra Gollogly; Paul A. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm by Bill Ward
On June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Holmes, III, of the Western District of Arkansas accepted the stipulation and remanded the case back to state court. [read post]
A recent decision by the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida has underscored the legal responsibilities landlords and property management companies have when it comes to maintaining rental units. [read post]
Reaffirming that the advisory “say-on-pay” vote required by the Dodd-Frank Act cannot be used to attack directors’ executive compensation decisions, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently dismissed a derivative complaint brought after a negative say-on-pay vote. [read post]
The district court acknowledged that a defendant generally cannot remove a case brought pursuant to the Jones Act in state court. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:15 am
  The guidelines were adapted from the "Suggested Protocol for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information" set forth by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]