Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 47,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
With those concerns in mind, Reinhard first unsuccessfully sought rehearing en banc (with the support of the United States as amicus curiae), before filing a petition for certiorari. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 10:03 am
Individual states and other jurisdictions may—at their discretion—adopt it in whole, in part, or not at all. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:26 pm
" While Judge Jones' ruling has no impact on state or federal employment discrimination laws, like last year's United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
Consider the Seventh Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
Barnes sued United and McCormick in State Court for claims arising from a wind and hail storm. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
NMCCA dismisses a conviction for consensual homosexual sodomy in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm
Often, these rulings are inconsistent across differing jurisdictions of the country and may get resolved before the United States Supreme Court, eventually. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
GOLDMAN v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
If this sounds familiar, it should: the Court used similar reasoning in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 10:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm
United States, No. 11-55712 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:12 am
Thirty years ago, the United States Supreme Court held that, to be patentable, subject matter must be useful and non-naturally occurring. [read post]
