Search for: "V D"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 76,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 4:34 pm
That'd be sort of silly, right? [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:49 am
See, e.g., Foday v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:45 am
[CNN] * Still figuring out where the Carson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
No. 18-cv-227, Complaint, ¶52 (D. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Housen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
(d) Washington’s arguments to the contrary are unconvincing. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:43 pm
Piénsese, por ejemplo, que la Administración vencedora en el litigio inicia luego los trámites para la revocación de ese mismo acto, o para su revisión de oficio, o, sencillamente, desiste de ejecutar la decisión cuya validez ha sido respaldada en vía jurisdiccional; y es entonces un tercero, que había comparecido en el proceso como codemandado, quien insta ante el Tribunal el efectivo cumplimiento de lo decidido en la sentencia por… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:32 pm
In Nunes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
III Clause 3(2) of the bill is amended by adding the following : (2.1) Paragraph 3(1)d)(i) of the Act is amended by adding the following: (i.1) reflect and be responsive to the preferences and interests of its audiences; (i.2) to the extent possible rely on market forces to ensure that Canadians obtain the programming of their choice; IV Clause 13 of the Bill is amended by adding the following subsection 2.1 to section 11 of the act 2.1 For greater certainty 2.1… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:20 am
Knowing from Judge Ho's footnote that he'd have affirmed the district court's finding of no antitrust standing, it appears more likely than not that one of the other two panel judges would have joined him, but they didn't have to address that part.The problem with Conti's case is that there are multiple bases on which it can be tossed even prior to any discovery--and if discovery had been conducted, I can't imagine the case would have survived summary judgment.… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
[D.] [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:22 am
She had two and a half hours until they’d have to eat again. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 am
Haaland (D. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
” In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:04 am
But other patents-in-suit are standard-essential patents (SEPs), with another Nokia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
In Mr J Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited [2022] UKET 4102454/2020, Mr Kovalkovs, an Orthodox Christian, was a quality inspector in 2 Sisters Food Group’s chicken processing factory. [read post]
