Search for: "Does 1 Through 10"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 21,532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
Whether one views the effects through the lens of competition law or that of contract law, one must not lose sight of royalty stacking. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Subsection (1) of section 932.703, Florida Statutes, is amended, a new subsection (2) is added, and present subsections (2) through (8) are redesignated as subsections (3) through (9), respectively, to read: 932.703 Forfeiture of contraband article; exceptions. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Subsection (1) of section 932.703, Florida Statutes, is amended, a new subsection (2) is added, and present subsections (2) through (8) are redesignated as subsections (3) through (9), respectively, to read: 932.703 Forfeiture of contraband article; exceptions. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Subsection (1) of section 932.703, Florida Statutes, is amended, a new subsection (2) is added, and present subsections (2) through (8) are redesignated as subsections (3) through (9), respectively, to read: 932.703 Forfeiture of contraband article; exceptions. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 12:56 am
Article 30(1) Brussels I-Reg (recast)]. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Mancini, No. 19-cv-119, 1993 WL 764212, at *1–2 (D.N.H. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:40 am
So, the essential characteristics could be identified on the basis of the overall impression produced by the sign or through an examination of the various components thereof, by means of a simple visual analysis or through a detailed examination which takes into account, eg, surveys, expert opinions, or data relating to earlier IPRs. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
Because of the heightened risk of collecting information of or concerning U.S. persons with no foreign intelligence value, restrictions were placed on the NSA’s retention, use and dissemination of information acquired through upstream collection, including a prohibition on queries using U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
On October 9, 2019, the White House issued two executive orders, Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents, (E.O. 13891), reprinted at 84 Fed. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
1. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 8:04 am
Claim 1 and 8 of the ‘131 patent: 1. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
., through an employee handbook) or as a matter of the employer’s practice. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 5:14 pm
Before its October 23, 2019 announcement of the JHS civil monetary penalties, OCR already had announced: A $10,000 resolution agreement with a dental practice for improperly disclosing patient PHI on social media at the beginning of October; Its first HIPAA right of access resolution agreement against a health care provider for violating HIPAA’s right of access rules on September 9, 2019 as part of its recently announced HIPAA access rule enforcement initiative; A… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:41 pm
“Number 10 probes Remain MPs’ ‘foreign collusion’. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
Still, this is less than 10% of Prof. de Beer’s number of 852. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
E.g., suppose Attorney General Barr gets to decide who does and doesn't get a jaywalking ticket.The paper has laudably broad ambitions, which combine devising a general compendium of issues and categories, with offering a couple of broad takeaways, e.g., (1) space to "fall short" of honoring all of the legal commands one faces is shrinking and this isn't all good, (2) more sophisticated and well-financed players will be especially well-equipped to take advantage… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:31 am
The NLRB says this proposed rulemaking “is intended to bring stability to an area of federal labor law in which the NLRB, through adjudication, has reversed its approach three times since 2000. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
”[1] (Cal. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:27 am
The act would create a small claims court for copyright that would allow rightsholders to sue for smaller copyright infringements without going through federal court. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
¶10.The Illinois Supreme Court disagreed with the lower court and held that the statute did not violate the First Amendment. [read post]