Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 6681 - 6700 of 76,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm by Giles Peaker
The tenant (by Toby Van Hagen) and HLPA (by Liz Davies QC) argued as follows: The HLPA’s arguments, supported by Ms Solomon’s statement, were in summary as follows: (1) The Court in Simmons v Castle saw “no good reason why the 10% increase should be limited so as to exclude any type of claim” and so declared that it should apply to all civil claims. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
  I usually don't buy claims about the "arc of history" but, this time, the long journey ended in a good place. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My “contextualist” study of all relevant eighteenth-century linguistic and legal sources revealed the ICC’s original meaning to ordinary readers, its drafters’ intent, and its ratifiers’ understanding.[15]First, Congress could regulate “commerce” – the voluntary sale of goods and services and accompanying activities intended for the market – but not purely cultural, moral, and social matters.[16]Second, such “commerce” had to… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
All well and good as long as the opposing party doesn’t decide to exercise a bit of leverage. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am by Peter Mahler
” Instead, he suggests, courts should follow Delaware’s lead in Zapata Corp. v Maldonado (Del. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by michael
It is a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, so it will restructure the company as opposed to it shutting down for good. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:00 am by Yosha Law
Take a look at these instances of social media posts used in the discovery that discredited a plaintiff’s case: In Largent v. [read post]