Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6681 - 6700 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2016, 3:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Both parties in Kakos argued about whether the reduction from twelve to six jurors affects the performance of the jury, but the Court said that it doesn’t matter: the only question was whether twelve jurors was part of the right “as heretofore enjoyed. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm by John Inazu
In the real world, however, the step even from A to B will always meet with resistance of all kinds from persons differently positioned, and, as a matter of fact, the chances of ever getting to Z are next to nothing. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Please consult the text as I don't want to type it all. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:15 pm by Juan Antunez
But if you actually try to dig into the Florida law defining these accounts, don't expect to find much. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:58 am by Wystan Ackerman
The Seventh Circuit rejected that argument, explaining that “it is not the final merits of the permission inquiry that matter for Rule 23(b)(3) purposes; it is the method of determining the answer and not the answer itself that drives the predominance consideration. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:26 am by David Aronberg
It does not matter if the dog has been vicious in the past. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
*The primary purpose of Art.6(1)(b) is to prevent the proprietor of a trade mark from stopping competitiors from using descriptive terms which form part of his trade mark in order to indicate certain characteristics of their products [IPKat comment - hang on a sec…if the primary purpose is to keep free terms which are already descriptive, this doesn't bode well for comparative advertising which seeks to make a comparison by using the trade mark owner's… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Al Jazeera Media, 2021 ONSC 1035 (CanLII) [60] The defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest requires two elements to be proven: (a) the impugned statements must be on a matter of public interest, and (b) the publisher must demonstrate that it was reasonably diligent in the steps taken to validate the accuracy of the factual statements made. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:23 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter how you plan to do your taxes this year, you likely don’t know what all of the numbers, letters and other information on those forms mean. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:08 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
It is seen as an advantage that time and costs can be saved and, in particular, that the impact on the environment can also be reduced. b. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:01 am by Ron Coleman
(b) If there is significant doubt about the need to classify information, it shall not be classified. [read post]