Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6681 - 6700
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Nancy Northup marks the one-year anniversary of last term’s abortion rights case, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:30 pm
” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
In National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
(See Mark Tushnet’s essay here.) [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
" TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Mark T. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 10:40 am
Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass’n v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
Honduras has already stated that they have appealed the decision, so the plain packaging saga will go on for a further number of years, due to the sheer value of the marks and brands at stake.Source: BBC News [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
Honduras has already stated that they have appealed the decision, so the plain packaging saga will go on for a further number of years, due to the sheer value of the marks and brands at stake.Source: BBC News [read post]
Precedential No. 40: TTAB Refuses to Allow Witness to Change Testimony in HOLLYWOOD HOTEL Opposition
22 Dec 2015, 4:40 am
Hollywood Casino LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:03 am
Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:11 pm
As a result, Phonebook submitted, the mark was registered in in breach of article 7(1)(c) and (d) as the mark lacked distinctive character, was descriptive and had become customary throughout the EU, with the exception of Italy. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
The Board considered the six factors set forth in Converse, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
In re WCM Industries, Inc., Serial No. 87555014 (March 17, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke).In Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
(See the policy reasoning in Renna v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 12:03 pm
Respectfully, Senator Steven V. [read post]