Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Crank, Wyoming Attorney General; Paul S. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
However, in Foreign Policy, David Francis outlines why that may not actually be such a good idea. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
Here's my post, which covers the argument for Hobby Lobby by Paul Clement and ends without getting to Solicitor General Donald Verrilli's argument against the religious exemption the company seeks. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Both special counsel and attorney general reports may i [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am
The New York Times tells us that Paul Ryan (R-WI) will replace John Boehner (R-OH) as Speaker of the House, writing that “Ryan’s ascent stems not from electoral victory but rather the chaos in the ranks of his party’s sizable majority. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
With the Senate set to approve the NDAA once again today, the Washington Post reports that President Obama may have missed his chance to force Congress to consider and potentially approve his plan to close Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm
But none of that makes Aspen an exclusive and extremely narrow path to the conclusion Judge Koh reached in FTC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
[22] While the foregoing may be true, it is argued that since the fiduciary duties of a director impose on such director the obligation to act in the best interest of the corporation, the business and investment decisions taken by directors should be addressed to mitigate and reduce the corporation’s risk (hedging) rather than to create it (speculation). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
Pirri: Barnes v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
EU v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:51 am
[v] See, e.g., People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The opinions in this post are solely his and do not necessarily represent those of Paul Hastings or any of its other partners. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
Another letter indicates that even parts of Norway may have been prepared to support Vasa because of the farmer’s opposition to Christian II’s high taxes. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
The Tribunal justified this distinction by referring to a number of B.C. cases, Mailloux v Tofino (District) at para 111, and Whistler (Resort Municipality) v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I don't see this having that kind of scope, a Roe v. [read post]
