Search for: "ROBERTS v. ROBERTS" Results 6681 - 6700 of 24,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 11:48 am
Missouri DWI dismissed by St Louis DWI Defense attorney; Client was stopped for running a red light and then submitted to field sobriety tests and failed a BAC test (breath test). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:24 am by Nabiha Syed
Pete Yost of the Associated Press reports on yesterday’s testimony by FBI Director Robert Mueller before a House subcommittee on the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:12 am
The Court has released the opinion in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am by Charles Fried
Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (Roberts, C.J., writing). [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 (1980), and Delaware v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
In today's Legal Times, Tony Mauro reports here on Justice Kennedy's role as the "swing vote" on the Roberts Court and his majority opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Cutler At the urging of President Biden, two members of Congress – Senator Robert Menendez and Representative Linda Sanchez – introduced companion 353-page bills last month in the Senate and the House entitled the “U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Cutler At the urging of President Biden, two members of Congress – Senator Robert Menendez and Representative Linda Sanchez – introduced companion 353-page bills last month in the Senate and the House entitled the “U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am by Mark Walsh
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Kelvin Lawrence
  In his dissent, Chief Justice Roberts observed that the City's administrative burden was an inadequate basis for denying the refunds given that the City already had calculated the amounts paid by both lump sum and installment taxpayers, and needed only to cut and mail checks. [read post]