Search for: "Smith, Appeal of"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 10,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit found that no manifest necessity justified the mistrial and that double jeopardy prohibited another attempt by the government to convict the defendant. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
., Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 10:14 am
Thus, the CBM program is generally cited as Section 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Cal. isn’t even appealing the loss on microstamping. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Smith, to die for murdering Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett in a murder-for-hire plot. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
An immigration judge rejected Abdulla’s arguments, and the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected his appeal as untimely because it had been filed beyond the 30-day appeal deadline and had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting certification of the appeal out of time. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
USPTO that challenges the agency’s right to “reopen prosecution” following a second rejection rather than allowing issues to be appealed. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
(The court faced but did not decide the issue of whether to overrule Smith in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:45 am
Smith as Special Counsel (November 18, 2022) Donald J. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2007). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
