Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 22,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
In relevant part, the fee agreement's arbitration clause states: XVII. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
Ortiz Subscription Required KINGS COUNTY Legal Profession Plaintiff Failed to Meet Burden Whether He Would Recover Award 'but for' Alleged Legal Malpractice Singh v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:12 am
Haight v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:53 am
Background: EFF Successfully Challenges Limitations on Exporting Encryption EFF's landmark legal victory in Bernstein v. the United States greatly reduced the burdens and barriers to exporting open source encryption software, including export through publication on the Internet. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
And while the State may be correct the DPIA reports’ confidentiality reflect a degree of narrow tailoring by minimizing the burden of forcing businesses to speak on controversial issues, that feature may also cut against the DPIA report requirement’s effectiveness at informing the greater public about how covered businesses use and exploit children’s data. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:00 am
Deaver v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
Two weeks ago, a federal district court in Texas decided Bear Creek Bible Church v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
If the defendants meet their burden, the plaintiff must respond and present evidence raising a fact issue. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
(The school district asserts that Bell carries the burden on this factor because its use was not commercial. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 1:30 pm
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:00 am
See the whole case, Ikama-Obambi v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 4:09 pm
In the first part of its opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 18-190 (does the presumption that prior art is enabled improperly invert the statutory burden). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
Pickens v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
Supreme Court 1997), and the defendant bears the `substantial’ burden of showing `fair and just reason’ for the withdrawal, U.S. v. [read post]
